Skip to main content
CNN.com International
The Web    CNN.com      Powered by
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ON TV
 
 
 
 
 
Law

Judge's comments gets molester's sentence tossed

Second action for same judge


YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Judiciary (system of justice)
Nebraska
Trials
Crime, Law and Justice

LINCOLN, Nebraska (AP) -- An appeals court threw out a child molester's sentence Tuesday because of religious comments made by the trial judge -- the same judge who had had another sentence thrown out for the same reason in 1998.

Jay Bruna, a former bus driver sentenced to 15 to 50 years for sexually assaulting a child on his bus, will remain in prison until he is resentenced.

The Nebraska Court of Appeals based its decision on the fact that District Judge George Thompson made religious references before sentencing, referring to his own earlier case.

Thompson said he could not comment on the ruling because, as the presiding judge in Sarpy County, he will have to assign the judge who will resentence Bruna.

In 1998, the Nebraska Supreme Court overturned the sentence of Aaron Pattno, charged with sexually abusing a boy, because at his sentencing, Thompson read a lengthy excerpt from the Bible that addressed homosexuality.

In throwing out the sentence, the court found that "a reasonable person could conclude that the sentence was based upon the personal bias or prejudice of the judge."

In 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to reinstate Pattno's sentence.

Before sentencing Bruna, Thompson referred to that earlier case, saying: "I probably would be better off not saying anything and simply imposing a sentence. The last time I sentenced a person that could be labeled as a `pedophile' I quoted from an author, a learned man that happened to be a contributor to the Bible.

"The case was reversed and resentenced by another judge to probation," Thompson said. "If people would continue to read that author, they would find that it's not a message of condemnation, but of hope."

In Tuesday's ruling, the Appeals Court said Thompson "has again inserted his own religious views in a sentencing proceeding."

In taking the original case to the U.S. Supreme Court, state prosecutors had argued that the state court decision, if not overturned, would threaten judges' religious freedom. The high court made no comment in declining to reinstate the sentence.



Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Story Tools
Click Here to try 4 Free Trial Issues of Time! cover
Top Stories
Judge: Late-term abortion ban unconstitutional
Top Stories
$10m reward for Chechen rebels
LAST NAME:
FIRST NAME:

CNN US
On CNN TV E-mail Services CNN Mobile CNN AvantGo CNNtext Ad info Preferences
SEARCH
   The Web    CNN.com     
Powered by
© 2004 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us.
external link
All external sites will open in a new browser.
CNN.com does not endorse external sites.
 Premium content icon Denotes premium content.